Getting Started With Your First Formative Document

Getting Started With Your First Formative DocumentStudents frequently ask whether it is necessary to include a thesis statement in their first formative educational documents, like an Informational Essay, Elementary Education essay, or College Scholarship Essay. The short answer is, it really depends. This may seem a paradox, but the answer is that your thesis statement doesn't have to be nearly as complex or convoluted as one that may accompany an Informational Essay or College Scholarship Essay.First, it is important to make the distinction between a thesis statement and a quotation. A thesis statement is meant to be your exact presentation of your argument.A thesis statement is generally designed to start the reader off and explain your argument in general terms and to get him or her engaged in the conversation. In some cases, this type of statement can act as a prelude to a more involved statement. If you want to include a thesis statement in your first formative educational docu ment, though, it should do so in a simple and direct manner.A thesis statement should not try to be more than this. It should be clearly stated in your first formative educational document and should not try to address any particular points that you would like to raise in future forms. As far as you are concerned, you are only dealing with one simple and direct issue. If you try to expand your scope of discussion in your first formative document, you will have to revisit your statement at the end of the semester or for a special occasion.A thesis statement should never attempt to be as descriptive or detailed as a quotation would be. By trying to be more general than necessary, you open the door to some rather messy and even rambling forms of argumentation that have nothing to do with your thesis topic. A statement is only as strong as its weakest and most superficial points.If your thesis statement is not long enough to be quoted, you may have to cut it down to a brief text that ca n serve the purpose of short summaries of your arguments. This could work for many problems, but if the student is not sure what his or her thesis statement should be, you will not want to cut it down too much, even if it is a brief statement.Regardless of how you prepare your thesis statement, it is important to note that the purpose of a thesis statement is to get the student engaged in the discussion that you have started. If you use too many words and too many points, the student may get bored, frustrated, or even angry with you. The most effective approach is to find a balance between wanting to explain and talking about the issue, so that the student doesn't lose interest.

About A Censorship - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1575 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2019/05/31 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Censorship Essay Did you like this example? With more than 336 million monthly active users worldwide as of the first quarter of 2018, Twitter is one of the biggest social networks worldwide (statista 1). With that many user accounts on twitter, it goes to show how powerful social media platforms have become. Many times, when content is posted online, the words, ideas, music, images, etc. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "About A Censorship" essay for you Create order can be taken out of context and if enough attention is given to it, then it is censored. Content censorship occurs regularly and can range in form from pornogrophy to political views. There are many different types of censorship, such as: corporate, moral, political, and religious censorship, but have something in common is that they all get censored when something hateful has been said. That is called censorship of speech. In todayrs world, it is safe to say that majority of people get their news through one of the following social media platforms: Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Instagram. With that being said, social media plays a big part into censorship because nothing spreads faster than something trending on social media, and if an unfavored content goes viral then it may be considered to be taken down/censored or they may get the account banned. Arguing for the protection of hate speech for example is difficult and sounds unpleasant. The internet and social media were des igned to be open platforms, where people can express ideas and acquire knowledge from others freely in a public forum. An open dialogue of speech an of ideas, however controversial, needs to happen, because conversations are our primary way of resolving conflicts and gaining new knowledge. When hearing the term hate speech, the most type of content that comes to mind is racism. So what is hate speech exactly? There is no clear agreeable definition of Hate speech as everyone hears things differently. According to Meriam-Webster, the legal definition of hate speech is: speech that is intended to insult, offend, or intimidate a person because of some trait (as race, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, or disability). One would think the definition is clear enough, but the definition is similar to the saying beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but instead it is more like hate speech is in the EAR of the beholder. Just as everyone observes what they see differently, they also perceive what they hear differently. In the U.S.A, there is the first amendment which is: the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition. The first amendment states, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise th ereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances (Constitutioncenter.org 1). The First Amendment does not protect individuals against private companies/organizations, such as private employers, private colleges, or private social media platforms. The First Amendment shackles only the government. The Supreme Court are the ones who interpret all the amendments and have stated that: talking, writing, radio-broadcasting, and using the Internet, are forms of speech. Although, free speech also applies to figurative expression such as: displaying swastica signs, and burning flags and crosses. The first amendment protects hate speech as long as it does not directly imminent violence. Speech, whether it be said on TV or tweeted online, can not be punished because of its hateful content. Arguing for the protection of hate speech for example is difficult and sounds unpleasant. Those that do argue for in favor of such positions, do not argue for hate speech, but rather for the right to Freedom of Speech in all platforms. No one argues for the protection of Freedom of speech than Nadine Strossen, a Professor of Constitutional Law at New York Law School and was the first women national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 through 2008. In her book Hate: Why we should resist it with Free Speech, not censorship, she strongly argues that censorship is not the answer to hate speech. In her book she quotes the cure is worse than the disease; the ?disease being hate speech and the ?cure being censorship. (insert personal idea here). Throughout her book, she provides many examples of what has been labeled hate speech including modern day themes such as the Black Lives Matter movement. She discusses the BLM movement and describes how people affiliate d with the movement have been targeted as perpetrators of hate speech against law enforcement and have therefore been blamed for countless murders of police officers that were argued to occur as a direct result of BLM rhetoric. In total contrast to the BLM movement, neo-nazis and white nationalist groups have been equally accused of their own hate speech directed at, usually, non-white minority groups and for whatever reason, ?The Jews. Both opposing sides see things differently and point the finger at each other seemingly unaware of their own hypocrisy. Although Nadine does not touch the subject on hate speech censorship on social media, it is important to recall how individuals are not protected by the first amendment from private social media platforms. (insert twitter censor policy).With that being said, it is still important to protect the principle. P4: (Talk about legal court cases that won and lost hate speech and their importance) The Skokie case is a well known classic free speech case that took place on March 20, 1977. Frank Collin, the leader of the National Socialist (Nazi) Party of America, informed Skokies police chief that they intended to march on the villages sidewalk on May 1. Skokie is the name of the village in Illinois. At that time its population consisted about 70,000 citizens, 40,000 of whom were Jewish. When news spread throughout the media, that the Nazis wanted to have a march in Skokie, there was an outrage. The villagers wanted to prohibit the march. This turned in the National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie. The village of skokie presented 3 reasons to the Illinois Supreme court; First, the display of the swastika promoted hatred against persons of Jewish faith or ancestry and that speech that promotes racial or religious hatred is unprotected by the First Amendment, second, the v illage argued that the purpose of the marches was to inflict emotional harm on the Jewish residents of Skokie and third, the village argued that if the Nazis were permitted to march there would be uncontrollable violence (Stone, Geoffrey R. 2). It is important to remember that we fight for the principle, which is freedom of speech. In contrast to the ?fight bad speech with more speech attitude of Nadine Strossen, many individuals such as, Barry Jason Mauer, an associate professor in the University of Central Florida Department of English, claim that hate speech is a form of anti-speech and therefore beyond the confines of dialogue. Others have said that they have felt physically threatened by hate speech and emotionally disturbed. Majority of the world has an account with Twitter, which one of the biggest social media platforms worldwide. Every second, on average, around 6,000 tweets are tweeted on Twitter (visualize them here), which corresponds to over 350,000 tweets sent per minute, 500 million tweets per day and around 200 billion tweets per year (internetlivestats.com). With so many tweets being written each each, it is no wonder why so many individuals have also experienced psychic trauma, and have felt silenced, because of hate speech content that has been posted online or heard through TV. In B arry Jason Mauer article, Censorship Is Not All Bad, published in the Huffington-Post, Mauer starts out his article with, Free-speech idealists argue that the solution to bad speech (misinformation, lies, abusive language, etc.) is not censorship but more speech. But bad speech can, and often does, drown out the good. Mayer states that fighting free speech with more speech is not the answer as their are misused forms of speech, to which, is true. These are all serious concerns, to which many individuals have suffered with first hand and have been exposed to hate speech that is and will not be punishable. Although we acknowledge those harms, loosening up the constraints on government to allow it to punish speech because of those less tangible, more speculative, more indirect harms † that censorial power will do more harm that good, precisely because the pendulum can swing. P6: (Include personal research) I wonder if other people feel the same about censorship. I ducted my own personal research to get a sense of how people feel about censorship right now. I created a poll on my Instagram account asking, should hate speech be censored? I had also asked a friend, who has a set of different followers, to post the same question to eliminate a bias result. In total, there were 82 people who voted; 34% voted yes (28) and 65% voted no (54). Although, I did receive a few comments following with their vote. All of the comments revolves around the same content, I am for censorship, but . I felt those who messaged me felt some kind of guilt for voting no on censoring hate speech and had to justify why they voted no. P7: (conclusion)Hate speech does not translate into actual high crimes against those who the hate speech is directed to. If censoring hate speech is taken away, then someoners right to freedom of speech is taken away. The(bring it back to your thesis and discuss why this is important to uphold)

The City Of God By John Milbank - 869 Words

After Augustine completed his literary piece known as the City of God, serious debate ensued regarding the correct interpretation of the concepts addressed in his writing. Augustine highlighted two realms, that of the earthly state known as the secular realm and the heavenly state known as the City of God. For instance, Etienne Gilson believed that Augustine was expressing the greatness of the earthly state while simultaneously explaining that the state bettered Christianity. Other philosophers such as Robert Markus interpreted Augustine’s writing as being supportive of the secular realm and claimed it to be independent from religion. Opposing both of these philosophers were James Schall and John Milbank. Their belief explained the political state to be sinful and evil. Analysis of all three positions ultimately revealed the ideas of Schall and Milbank to hold a deeper understanding of the truth than those of Markus and Gilson. In the City of God, Augustine repeatedly explaine d how the earthly state and the City of God were opposites which contradicted Etienne Gilson’s thoughts. He began by comparing and contrasting who the people of the earthly and heavenly states worshipped. People of the earthly state worshipped the Roman Empire’s gods while people of the heavenly state revered the one, true God. Here Augustine proclaimed, â€Å"For, so far as concerns themselves, their piety and probity, which are gifts of God, suffice to give them true felicity, enabling them to live wellShow MoreRelatedThe Church: An Analysis of The Rerum Novarum Publication1898 Words   |  8 Pagesthe encyclical one hundred years later, to analyse the development of policy in1891 and 1991 in terms of the church’s teaching, within the context of the wider social and political movements of the late twentieth century. I will determine that whilst John Paul II used the centenary in 1991 to publish Centesimus Annus and see it as a ‘re-wording’ of the original, it ultimately failed to take forward the radical change envisaged in Rerum Novarum, with limited exceptions. Firstly we need to analyse theRead More Art, Literature And Society From 1955-1970 Essay examples5829 Words   |  24 Pagesbeing that all suffering can be repressed. Although the only way to repress life’s suffering, aside from maintaining constant and intense meditation, was to return to the blissful void of death (Hipkiss, p.65). In the quot;113th Chorusquot; of Mexico City Blues is a perfect explanation of this blissful void. Since only two lines address life(quot;Got up and dressed up, and went out amp; got laidquot;), it is clear that Kerouac’s emphasis is on the hereafter. It is only after everything has endedRead MoreCorrectional Administration Reviewer18383 Words   |  74 Pagesshall not be imposed, nor be cruel and unusual punishment inflicted. ï  ½ ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF PENALTIES OR PUNISHMENTS Natural Law. This originated from God (natural law) to enforce the law that laid down in His infinite wisdom and power. He also prescribed the penalty or punishment. Banishment/ distierro. The first penalty or punishment prescribed by God to Adam and Eve when they disobey His order which made them as the first criminals. Retribution/ Personal vengeance/ Revenge. The most common ancientRead MoreThe Rise of China and Future of the West17670 Words   |  71 PagesLiberal System Survive? By G. John Ikenberry January/February 2008 Summary:   Chinas rise will inevitably bring the United States unipolar moment to an end. But that does not necessarily mean a violent power struggle or the overthrow of the Western system. The U.S.-led international order can remain dominant even while integrating a more powerful China -- but only if Washington sets about strengthening that liberal order now. G. JOHN IKENBERRY is Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International

A Case Study on Cheat Sheet to Pregnancy Hormones

Question: Describe about the A Cheat Sheet to Pregnancy Hormones? Answer: Source of Hormone Hormone Functions Level during Pregnancy Placenta HCG or Human Chorionic Gonadotropin For maintenance of the corpus leteums progesterone secretion for promotion of endometrium and prevention of menstruation until placenta becomes mature enough to sustain indigenous progesterone. The level of HCG start increasing eight days post evolution and tend to peak around 60 to 80 days after conception Corpus Leutem till 10 weeks and then placenta Progesterone It enables relaxation of uterus muscles, enhance acceptance to foetus During the first 3 months, there is exponential increase in levels after which it plateaus Corpus Leutem initially and then placenta Estrogen It plays a critical role in the development of foetus by stimulating the production of hormones in the adrenal gland of the foetus and thereby enable its normal development During the first 3 months, there is exponential increase in levels after which it plateaus Hypothalamus Oxytocin Plays a crucial role in the simulation of contractions of uterus at the time of delivery along with simulation of milk production Exponential increase till week 10 after which it witnesses a decline Hypothalamus Prolactin It plays a crucial role in preparing the breast for lactation and subsequent milk releasing The level tends to increase during the pregnancy and reach a level nearly 10-20 times of normal levels Placenta Relaxin Plays a crucial role in delivering by allowing relaxation of uterine muscles and ligaments of pelvic bones The level tends to increase during the pregnancy and reaches a level nearly 10 times of normal levels The male reproductive hormones are summarised in the table below (Starr McMillan, 2014). Source of Hormone Hormone Functions Hypothalamus GnRH Stimulating the FSH and LH secretion Pituitary Gland FSH It leads to sperm maturation Pituitary Gland LH Stimulates the secretion of testosterone and production of androgen by testes Testes (Laydig Cells) Testosterone Responsible for stimulating sex drive Pituitary Gland Inhibin Feedback to slowdown the release of FSH and LH The female reproductive hormones are summarised in the table below (Starr McMillan, 2014). Source of Hormone Hormone Functions Hypothalamus Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) Stimulating the FSH and LH secretion Pituatary Gland Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH It triggers the development of ovarian follicle and is responsible for controlling ovum production Pituatary Gland Leutenizing hormone(LH) Stimulates the ovaries to produce oestrogen and progesterone along with promotion of corpus leteum development Ovaries Oestrogen Responsible for maturation and release of ovum in every menstrual cycle Ovary (Corpus Leteum) Progesterone Preparation of the uterus lining for reception and development of fertilised ovum Reference Hochwald, L. nd, A Cheat Sheet to Pregnancy Hormones, Parents Website, Available online from https://www.parents.com/pregnancy/my-life/emotions/understanding-pregnancy-hormones/ (Accessed on November 28, 2015)Starr, C McMillan, B 2014, Human Biology, 10th edn, Cengage Learning, Belmonte